OpenAI Safety Worker Resigns and Calls the Industry's Culture Broken
David Robinson spent years at OpenAI writing the safety assessments that went out alongside every major model launch. This week he resigned, and published an editorial in The Atlantic explaining why, according to The Verge.
His core argument is not about a specific model or a specific failure. It is about how the whole industry operates. He describes Silicon Valley's approach to AI development as driven by "extreme confidence" and "perpetual sprints" — building bigger and more powerful systems with an optimism that consistently underestimates what could go wrong. The incentives push forward; the mechanisms for slowing down and checking the work do not keep pace.
What Robinson wants is a different operating model entirely. He compares it to nuclear power and aviation: industries where a single human error can be catastrophic, so they are built around redundancy, slow deliberate planning, and systems designed to catch mistakes before they become disasters.
Robinson is not alone. A pattern has emerged over the past several months of researchers and safety staff leaving prominent AI labs and speaking publicly afterward. Jacob Coxon left Anthropic; Robert O'Callahan, Bilal Chughtai, and Josh Engels left Google DeepMind; Joe Benton also left Anthropic.
It is worth noting that people who helped build something bearing witness to its risks can still be right, even if their timing is inconvenient.
What to watch: Whether OpenAI responds publicly, and whether any of the major labs move to adopt the kind of structural safety practices Robinson is describing.
Sources

